Today’s Academic Senate Meeting: Our Take

April 29, 2013

Today in the last meeting of the year of the Academic Senate, it was announced that the Senate Executive Committee might meet over the summer to examine wages, benefits and working conditions.

We in the CFA have spent the past two years talking with our colleagues about  salaries, benefits, working conditions. Clearly our efforts have attracted the attention of the central administration, which has finally taken serious notice of these concerns. However, our discussions have also revealed that the vast majority of faculty voices are not usually part of the top-down policy-formulating and decision making process.  This newly announced and vaguely constituted committee may or may not come up with recommendations; it is a very small step.

The CFA wants to emphasize that only a legally binding collective bargaining agreement can effectively and fairly resolve salary disparities, improve retirement benefits and family leave policies, guarantee a fair and transparent grievance process, and address many of the other issues that affect the faculty.  We also point out that anything granted by administrative fiat can also be taken away.  Collective bargaining is the best path to protect and enhance working conditions here at UIUC.

For further information please check out this website or email us at campusfacultyassoc@gmail.com.

Visioning Future Excellence: First Reactions

We at Campus Faculty Association are still studying Chancellor Wise and Provost Adesida’s announcements at the Town Hall meeting on Monday.  We are pleased to see recognition of some of the pressing concerns we have been hearing in our face-to-face conversations all around campus, but we have reservations about some of the planned actions, and whether they will meet campus needs.

Our first take is that the plan to hire new faculty is a step in the right direction, but insufficient. The plan sounds dramatic (“hire 500 new faculty”), but the full announcement is much less satisfactory, and will achieve no more than replacing the faculty numbers lost in the past few years. Over the last five years, tenure track faculty numbers have fallen by about 10%, while student numbers have risen by about the same percentage.   The Visioning Future Excellence plan aims to replace these lost faculty over roughly the next seven years, while also adding back those lost to normal attrition. This is how they reach the headline number of 500 hires, by including replacement faculty hires.  By 2020, faculty numbers should be back where they were in 2007 – yet with thousands more students to teach than in that year.

While this is an important start, it is not enough to strengthen and preserve research and teaching excellence at our university. The surge in retirements and departures over the last few years was caused in large part by the threat of further damage to our retirement benefits, and by frozen and lagging salaries.  We still face those threats, and our own central administration has announced that it supports a permanent 2% pay cut in the form of an increased employee contribution to SURS.  The administration has also endorsed a reduction of the cost of living adjustment for future retirees.  Until these major problems are solved, UIUC will face continued erosion of the tenure-stream faculty.    A union with collective bargaining rights would help faculty to address pension issues at the campus and state levels, and would work with the University to preserve excellence over the long term.

Myths About Faculty Unions: #4

“Union advocates aren’t interested in excellence. They would destroy our merit based system and make everyone equal.”

The CFA is interested in excellence. That’s why we talk about class size, the growth of insecure adjunct jobs, allocation of faculty lines and research money, faculty salaries and benefits, and health and safety. In our conversations around campus, we are routinely asking for input about what faculty can do to improve the quality of education and research at UIUC―the centerpiece of excellence.

How would a union preserve our system of merit-based salaries? Under collective bargaining agreements, faculty at other research universities have decided to create merit raise pools over and above basic increases, to be distributed as department heads decide.

On the other hand, everyone should be treated fairly and decently. We could negotiate to raise the extremely low base-line salaries of non-tenure track faculty.

Family & Medical Leave: A Union Makes a Difference

Keeping up with professional commitments at a large research university can be daunting. Writing, publishing, teaching, grading, advising and professional development demand significant investments of time and energy. But many faculty members also juggle challenging family duties—having and caring for children, and often, caring for older relatives as well. Faculty need access to a range of options for balancing family and professional responsibilities, and they look to their university employer for help. Many universities provide family leave or modified duty arrangements at critical moments in family life. Research by the Campus Faculty Association shows, however, that unionized faculty, whether tenure track or non-tenure track, fare better than non-unionized faculty when it comes to family and medical leave benefits. In particular, faculty unions at other research universities have won substantial gains over what we have at UIUC right now.

Under current policies, UIUC faculty are largely at the mercy of departments and higher administration when they seek leave, even for serious medical issues or major life events. Paid medical and parental leave is nearly non-existent—tenured faculty here only receive about two sick days per month, less than half of which can carry over from year to year. Even unpaid leaves for medical reasons are only guaranteed up to the federal minimum; beyond that it is up to the discretion of deans and department heads. We can do better.

In this report, we summarize how UIUC compares to unionized campuses in the areas of 1) family and medical leave 2) parental leave (paid and unpaid) and 3) the use of sick leave 4) opportunities for modified duties 5) transparency. We think you will agree that there is much room for improvement. These findings apply to tenured, tenure-track and non-tenure track employees, as many of the contracts we studied mandate family and medical leave across the range of faculty titles.

1) FAMILY AND MEDICAL LEAVE

Federal legislation, known as the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), provides a minimum floor for benefits in this area. The FMLA applies to all public agencies, including state run university systems. It provides for twelve workweeks of job-protected leave in a twelve month period. As a UIUC faculty member, this is your only guaranteed leave for all major medical and family related events. FMLA leave may be paid leave, but this is not required. At UIUC it is unpaid unless you elect to use your accumulated sick leave, and this still requires administrative approval.

2) PARENTAL LEAVE

Paid

Many collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) include entitle- ment to some paid leave time for new parents. UIUC’s current rules provide two weeks paid parental leave to faculty members who have served at least six months. Such leave must be taken in full and cannot include any period of modified duties. As anyone who has had a new baby in the house realizes, two weeks leave is inadequate, to say the least. Compare this to the contract held by the chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) at the University of New Hampshire, which provides for a full twelve weeks paid leave. The agreement between the California State University system and the California Faculty Association grants 30 consecutive days paid leave, requiring only that the leave commence between 60 days prior to the child’s anticipated arrival date and 75 days after.

Unpaid

Unlike UIUC, nearly all institutions with unionized faculties guarantee a longer period of unpaid leave in addition to the FMLA entitlement. The CBA covering faculty at the University of Delaware (UD) provides for unpaid family leave separate from FMLA leave. UD provides for one year per child, up to a maximum of two years per faculty member. Once this two year maximum is reached, FMLA leave can be used for time off related to the birth or adoption of a child. The contracts held by the AAUP at University of Connecticut and University of Rhode Island (URI) specify six months, including the twelve weeks of FMLA leave. The SUNY United University faculty members get seven months, and the University of Vermont United Academics as well as the University of Cincinnati AAUP have contracts which grant up to one year. Most of these contracts also make extensions available to faculty who request it. For instance, the U of Cincinnati allows the exten- sion of “child-rearing leave” up to a maximum of two years, and URI provides an extension of six months.

3) THE USE OF SICK LEAVE

UIUC has a sick leave policy which is substantially inferior to the policies of most comparable, unionized institutions. Faculty here can accumulate a maximum of twelve sick days per year, while those at the Universities of Rhode Island, Cincinnati and New York get a minimum of fifteen. Senior faculty at SUNY get up to 20, and all faculty at CUNY get 20 sick days per year, and can accumulate a maximum of 300. UIUC has a tricky policy which specifies that, once a faculty member has exhausted their cumulative sick days, thirteen non-cumulative sick days become available. The use of sick days is the only way to draw any income (after the first two weeks) while on parental leave at UIUC.

4) MODIFIED DUTIES

UIUC Campus Administrative Manual includes section IX- C-45, “Modified Teaching Duties for Faculty Members with a New Child.” It acknowledges the strain on departments and students when a faculty member takes time off, and stipulates in a fairly progressive fashion an alternative to taking full parental leave. (Note that the emphasis is on departmental, not parental needs.) UIUC’s modified duties policy states that, in order to care for a new child, the faculty member may be relieved of teaching duties without any reduction in salary provided they keep up with their other “professional responsibilities… (e.g., preparation of research proposals, papers, and course materials; supervision of graduate student research).” This is a positive provision which faculty should strive to maintain as a kind of base line. It does not apply to non-tenure track faculty. We can improve on this.

5) TRANSPARENCY

The vast majority of collective bargaining agreements are de- finitive, exclusive policy documents for all terms of employment and administration to which they refer. A faculty member can find all provisions regarding family and related benefits in the CBA. They are not subject to change without bargaining. By contrast, in terms of family benefits and related issues, faculty at UIUC may refer to three different sources to ascertain their benefits: The General Rules, approved directly by the Board of Trustees, which specify sick day leave.

The Campus Administrative Manual (CAM), the definitive policy document for UIUC which contains more than half a dozen provisions on maternity and paternity leave. It is available in full at http://www.cam.illinois.edu/.

The Academic Staff Handbook (ASH), which is the most widely distributed and the least updated resource. Though most faculty refer to this, the Handbook itself warns that it “is not a policy document in and of itself and may not reflect the most updated policies available. Please see the policies refer- enced or follow up with the contacts listed to confirm current applicable details.”

Not only can a CBA secure and guarantee better benefits, it can also concentrate the information in one place—it is a legally binding public document which is readily available to all.

A UNION CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE-JOIN US

As you can see from our research, collective bargaining can have a positive impact on faculty benefits in regard to balancing family and professional life. These benefits are especially crucial for women faculty whose academic careers are frequently disrupted or slowed-down due to the demands of pregnancy, childbirth and childcare issues. Women are also more likely to bear responsibility for aging parents and relatives.

We urge you to join us in our campaign to establish collective bargaining at UIUC. In the past CFA has made significant contributions to gender equity and the availability of child care on campus. We can move forward to more adequate and equitable family leave policies. Improving family benefits is important not only for ensuring better working conditions for faculty in the short run, but also for attracting and retaining the sort of researchers and teachers that a top public university requires.

Our Weekly Reader for the Week of Jan. 21, 2013

First week of the semester, and a combination of depressing news. If you see something from the week that I missed, tell me for next week. — Bruce

1. UIUC labor problems continue. The SEIU situation is heating up. Below are links to a story in the DI and to the SEIU Facebook page which contains up-to-date information on picketing:

http://www.dailyillini.com/news/campus/article_1e95bdd2-605e-11e2-9e7e-0019bb30f31a.html

http://www.facebook.com/events/519855244713818/

2. Moody’s gave a negative outlook for higher education, from the corporate point of view. See

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/17/business/moodys-outlook-on-higher-education-turns-negative.html

“Until universities demonstrate better ability to lower their cost of operations, perhaps through more intensive use of online classes and elimination or reduction of tenure, we expect government officials to produce bolder solutions in response to the public outcry against the cost of higher education,” the report said.

We can expect administrators who are ignorant of the values of the university community to use those suggestions against us.

But see:

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/business/economy/2013-01-17/ui-finance-chief-optimistic-despite-moodys-outlook-higher-education

3. Not necessarily depressing. E-mail spoofers beware: ace sleuth Patrick Fitzgerald is on the BOT! And dig what Nick Burbules says, because it is crucial to understand that the perception of integrity is always completely determined by its subject. (Lots of coverage in the E-news listings from 1/18..)

http://www.news-gazette.com/news/education/2013-01-19/fitzgerald-appointment-well-received-ui.html

“As an institution that is committed to maintaining the highest levels of integrity in our own practice, Patrick Fitzgerald will be a strong advocate for those values,” said UI Professor Nicholas Burbules, chairman of the University Senates Conference, a governance group of faculty from all three campuses. Events like Category I and the falsification of law school data do not define the institution’s values, Burbules said. “We don’t need to restore our integrity. Our integrity as an institution is a given,” he said. Burbules said he sees the appointment of Fitzgerald “as an expression of our integrity as an institution, a reminder that these aberrations do not define who we are.”

4. Earlier this week, Ralph Martire gave an interesting pension reform proposal and Rich Miller, a non-partisan political blogger in Springfield who is widely read by insiders, gave it basically his seal of approval as a base. The essence is a refinancing of the amount due the funds.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20130116/OPINION/130119858/heres-an-actual-honest-to-goodness-pension-fix

http://capitolfax.com/2013/01/17/its-not-a-total-fix-but-martires-plan-should-be-incorporated/

Miller points out:

The Tribune and some big business groups will also hate it. Why? Because it causes no real pain for public employees and retirees. And that’s really what they want.

5. Short takes on (i) The leadership skills of Gov. Quinn, (ii) The Tea Party’s anti-labor agenda, (iii) Faculty participation in financial exigency, (iv) The dangers of MOOCs, (v)

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-quinn-leadership-skills-20130113,0,3150458.story

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/01/14-0

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/15/aaup-calls-faculty-participation-financial-exigency-declarations

http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2013/01/14/essay-says-faculty-involved-moocs-may-be-making-rope-professional-hangings

6. And finally, rather than a blast from 2012 (see #3 if you are nostalgic), readers should know that an interest in societal change is not limited to faculty in the humanities and social sciences. At the Joint Mathematical Meetings in San Diego earlier this month, there was a special session on “Math and social justice”. A link to the materials from that session appeared on a mailing list I belong to, and with permission of the transmitter, Samuel Coskey, here it is:

https://sites.google.com/site/next4sj/

——————————–

From the UI Daily E-Summary http://www.uillinois.edu/our/news/summary.cfm  As a reminder: my sources are these, plus the News-Gazette (NG), Daily Illini (DI), New York Times (NYT), Chicago Tribune (Trib), a bunch of google-news, and the goodness of my readers, who send me things I might have missed.

——————————–
1/14 — p.1 (NG) SEIU story linked last week
1/14 — p.2 (DI) “SEIU takes step closer toward striking”
1/14 — p.4 (NG) Scott Reeder’s reactionary op-ed on pensions from the Sunday paper
1/14 — p.6 (NG) Letter “Proposed reforms really benefit cuts”
1/14 — pp.10-13 (Indianapolis Star) “Six issues awaiting Mitch Daniels at Purdue”

1/15 — p.1 (Crain’s) “University of Illinois at Chicago among top schools for online bachelor’s”, UIUC not much, for our online graduate degrees
1/15 — pp.11-12 (InsideHigherEd) “AAUP calls for faculty participation in financial exigency declarations”, see above
1/15 — pp. 24-27 (NYT) “California to give web courses a big trial”, actually San Jose State.

1/16 — p.6 (Crain’s) “Here’s an actual honest-to-goodness pension fix”, see above.
1/16 — pp.14-15 (InsideHigherEd) “Universities spend more on athletics per athlete than on academics per student”
1/16 — pp.35-67 (Trib) The massive pay-walled four-part story on the bankruptcy of the Tribune Co. Note length!

1/17 — pp.1-2 (Trib) “No second term for U of I trustee appointed after scandal”. (Probably because he’s supposed to be independent, but voted in a D primary.)
1/17 — pp.5-6 (NG) “UI Finance chief optimistic despite Moody’s outlook on higher education”
1/17 — pp.9-10 (InsideHigherEd) “Moody’s report calls into question all traditional university revenue sources”
1/17 — p.14 (NG) “Possible strike looms for SEIU”
1/17 — pp.24-25 (NYT) “At many top public universities, intercollegiate sports come at an academic price”
1/17 — pp.26-35 (NYT) “Next made-in-China boom: college graduates” (Getting their degrees in China, not the US.)

1/18 — pp.1-7  (various) Coverage of Patrick Fitzgerald’s appointment to the BOT
1/18 — pp.10-11 (various) pension stuff
1/18 — pp.15-16 (NYT) “Measuring the success of online education” some skepticism

Faculty Unions And Pay Leveling

Certain documentation being circulated among faculty at the moment implies that unionization could eliminate merit-based pay and lead to a leveling of salaries across the  university. This is blatantly false-as the experience of dozens of unionized campuses around the country has shown. CFA has compiled a one page document, “The Myth of Pay Leveling,” which summarizes the issues of salaries and pay raises at four universities which have collective bargaining. Click No Pay Leveling to read this document.

Our Weekly Reader for Week Beginning December 9, 2012

1. The first big news this week is that the GEO ratified their contract with the University. The University wanted to put the tuition waivers into the revenue mix, but those crafty grad students outsmarted them once again. For details go to the GEO homepage  uigeo.org ; fortunately, there is no longer any need for a CFA strike page. Other coverage includeshttp://www.news-gazette.com/news/education/2012-12-07/geo-members-ratify-five-year-contract.html

http://www.dailyillini.com/news/campus/article_bd1030d4-40ae-11e2-9c38-001a4bcf6878.html

The News-Gazette page also contains a link to the contract itself.

For a dissenting view, see

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/dec2012/uiuc-d04.shtml2. The second big news is that it’s pension reform season in Springfield once again. A large number of links can be found on our page

http://cfaillinois.org/2012/12/06/more-information-on-pensions-bill-hb6258/

and we will update as new information becomes available. An excellent source is http://www.suaa.org/ , which usually has a “mini-briefing” after each day in which there is meaningful and publicly-known change.

3. Other articles:

i. Stanford wants to try to get a 5 year PhD in the humanities:

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/12/04/stanford-moves-ahead-plans-radically-change-humanities-doctoral-education#.UL36UsfmNR0.twitter

ii. Coursera wants to link its better students with companies, who would pay for the lists, and Chancellor Wise is on its advisory board.

http://www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2012/12/05/coursera-creates-service-help-its-many-students-find-jobs

iii. The University has had declining returns on its acceptance letters since 2006.

http://www.dailyillini.com/news/campus/article_43e41898-3ea0-11e2-b396-0019bb30f31a.html

iv Google gives me this link to an AP story. “Illinois. Our State. Our team.” Haven’t the people of the state of Illinois suffered enough?

http://www.galesburg.com/newsnow/x1745970478/University-of-Illinois-starts-billboard-campaign